It's not easy being a political independent during an election year. Everything you say ends up pissing somebody off. Most years, we can drift from group to group, pleasantly agreeing with what the extremists say because, after all, we are reasonable and we can usually find a grain of truth in even the most out-there arguments. More important, even the extremists are laid back during off years, and they don’t get too indignant when we say something that might otherwise infuriate them.
Election years change all that.
Take Barack Obama. The good senator gave a marvelous speech last week. He elucidated the problems of many minorities in this country, the resentments of many in the “majority” (NB: aren’t white people a plurality these days?), and he did his best to deflect attention from the ultra-incendiary Reverend Wright by imploring that the American public engage in a true dialogue. Imagine that! A true dialogue -- every Independent’s dream!
When I told my friends I loved Obama’s speech, I got two basic responses:
- “Obama is a brilliant man and he is the one who can restore America’s dignity throughout the world. I'm so glad you are on our side!”
- “You actually fell for that speech? Sure, Obama knows how to give a good speech, but the fact is he embraces a racist minister. I can’t believe you fell for that snake oil. Obama doesn’t care about change, and he doesn’t care about a true racial dialogue; he just wants to take the attention offered his own race problems.”
The first response was clearly given by Obama supporters. No surprise there. The second response is slightly more surprising: sure, conservatives were shocked that I had been hoodwinked. But Hillary supporters were equally, if not more angry at Obama’s words.
Here is a direct quote from a chat I had last week with an ardent Hillary supporter:
“The man promotes tolerance of another man who has basically advocated the overthrow of the government — I hardly think Obama’s speech was enough. I just think that if Obama were the Uniter he claims to be, he would have disassociated himself with that church and that crazy preacher a long time ago. And it makes me question his judgment. Some of you Obama people are maniacs and deluded.”
I had to remind my friend that I am a registered independent and not necessarily an “Obama supporter.” But when we independents express support for anything — any position, any candidate’s speech, any progressive or conservative idea — we’re guaranteed to be attacked by one of the extremes.
Especially during a vitriolic presidential campaign year. Nowhere is safe! The Left and Right hurl their talking point bombs at each other, everyone dodges each other’s points instead of listening and debating… and here we are, stuck in the middle, getting pelted by both sides.
Nobody wants to listen. Nobody wants to engage in a dialogue. Nobody, that is, except Independents.
That’s why I created IntelligentIndependent.com. There are plenty of sites out there aimed at crazy conservatives, and plenty aimed at crazy liberals — but where are the sites for all us crazy independents?
This will be a site for the oddball who is not only passionate about politics, but passionate about lively, spirited debate — and passionate about solutions, no matter which side introduces them.
Conservatives are right: sometimes the free market is the answer. Sometimes government intrusion is the problem.
And liberals are right: Sometimes corporate greed is harmful. Sometimes government assistance is the answer.
Politically independent doesn’t mean politically boring. Politically independent does not necessarily mean politically moderate. Politically independent means politically thoughtful. It means listening to all sides of an argument, exploring the length of the political spectrum, and only then making an informed decision.
Political independence means political intelligence. Let the intelligent independent discussion begin.
6 intelligent comments:
I mostly agree with you, but just be a little careful with your generalization - I think it's unsafe to say that nobody but the independants is willing to engage in a discussion. I, for instance, am a staunch liberal. I will always vote democrat. At the same time, I do not agree with everything the Democratic Party does. I think they get a lot wrong, and I think the crazy liberal sites tend to be a bit overzealous. But, I think that the Republican side tends to get a whole lot more wrong. My point is, I'm perfectly willing to share my views on why I believe what I believe, and to listen to your views on why you believe what you believe, and so on.
I agree, by the way, that Obama's speech was incredibly good. If your Hilary supporter was unable to recognize his speech for what it was - a mature and thoughtful reflection on the state of race relations in modern America - then that is too bad for that supporter. Of course he shouldn't distance himself from the preacher over a few comments. It's much more mature to say there is more to the man than these sound bites. I mean really, do we only surround ourselves with people who we completely agree with all the time? Is that healthy?
Anyway it is late and I have been drinking a little and I'm probably rambling :)
Love the new site.
I will enjoy watching this site unfold. I am also a registered Independent with many opinions, most of which I will not put into writing on the interwebs, unfortunately.
I will however be here in the shadows and will pipe up when I feel I have something beneficial or relevant to contribute.
Great site!
My first thought upon discovering TII: "Does this guy really need ANOTHER blog?"
Then I read your intro-post, and understanding came. After I reacted poorly in response to your McCain support, you may be surprised to know that I'm and independent as well. I'm not "registered," mind you - in fact, I almost feel like having to "register" as anything defeats the very nature of independence. Thankfully I'm registered to vote in a state that doesn't require party-registering to vote (one of its few civil-libertarian virtues).
Given your reaction to my McCain comment, however, I do offer a bit of advice (and trust me, I have to remind myself to do this sometimes): When someone offers a fervent reaction, however polar, ask them the reason behind their passion. Why DO they believe what they believe so strongly? What you learn may be surprising and interesting...and in some cases, your antagonizer may see holes in his/her logic. Either way, there is growth and progress.
In a nutshell, I agree with your first responder: be careful. Even the most zealous of zealots may be interested in dialogue. Sometimes it's only a matter of approach.
Either way, great forum! Can't wait to see what comes of it.
you independents need to pick a side. life is not always about using the tv remote to tivo past the ads, sometimes the new car commercials are better art than you see at a museum. i think i have made my point.
also i think that you guys have over looked the big reason why this election is so much more different than the other ones. normally we have only two people running for election. this year we have three. since there are only two parties and three candidates it is so normal that there be a new independents party so stablize the election and so that everyone can vote for her candidate.
Like most things, I'm of two minds about political independents: 1) it is easy because you don't have to take a side - you get to cherry pick and somehow be "above the fray"; and 2) it does allow for the flexibility that is inherent in almost everyone that recognizes that they are shades of grey.
As for Sen. Obama's speech, while I did not listen to all of it because he lost me long ago with his smoke and mirrors act, what I did hear was indeed thoughtful and (here I paraphrase Peggy Noonan) actually assumed an intelligent audience instead of speaking in platitudes.
Lastly, as for your line about "sometimes liberals are right", you did not give the contrapositive about harmful corporations; for all their impersonality and focus on profit, few of the necessities, let alone luxuries, that we enjoy today would be possible without corporations.
Food for thought and a good first post.
Post a Comment